Izboljšanje učne uspešnosti v osnovnem izobraževanju: Vloge reševanja problemov in izzivov kreativnega mišljenja
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18690/rei.4930Ključne besede:
reševanje problemov, kreativnost, učna uspešnost, osnovnošolsko izobraževanje, Južni Vietnam.Povzetek
V študiji preučujemo vpliv aktivnosti reševanja problemov in kreativnega mišljenja na pouk naravoslovja v osnovni šoli. V raziskavi je sodelovalo 64 učencev tretjega razreda in 62 učencev petega razreda iz Južnega Vietnama, pri čemer je bila polovica razporejena v eksperimentalne skupine, druga polovica pa v kontrolne. Eksperimentalne skupine, ki so prejemale strukturirane učne ure, so dosegle boljše rezultate kot kontrolne skupine, ki so uporabljale tradicionalne učne metode. Rezultati poudarjajo pozitiven vpliv vključevanja teh aktivnosti na učno uspešnost in podpirajo učinkovitost strukturirane podpore pri izboljšanju učnih dosežkov.
Literatura
Abdollahi, A., Abu Talib, M., Carlbring, P., Harvey, R., Yaacob, S. N., and Ismail, Z. (2018). Problem-solving skills and perceived stress among undergraduate students: The moderating role of hardiness. Journal of Health Psychology, 23(10), 1321-1331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316653265
Avci, U., and Durak, H. Y. (2023). Innovative thinking skills and creative thinking dispositions in learning environments: Antecedents and consequences. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, Article 101225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101225
Byun, T., and Lee, G. (2014). Why students still can't solve physics problems after solving over 2000 problems. American Journal of Physics, 82(9), 906-913. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4881606
Chaojing, M. (2023). A study on strategies for cultivating higher-order thinking skills in primary and secondary school students. Frontiers in Educational Research, 6(20), 67-71.
Chi, M. T. (2009). Active-constructive-interactive: a conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 73-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x
Dang, H. T. T., Thi Bui, D., and Nhan, T. T. (2023). Enhancing creativity in secondary school mathematics: A quasi-experimental, mixed methods study in Vietnam. Issues in Educational Research, 33(2), 488-509.
Denervaud, S., Christensen, A. P., Kenett, Y. N., and Beaty, R. E. (2021). Education shapes the structure of semantic memory and impacts creative thinking. NPJ Science of Learning, 6(1), Article 35. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00113-8
Dobber, M., Zwart, R., Tanis, M., and van Oers, B. (2017). Literature review: The role of the teacher in inquiry-based education. Educational Research Review, 22, 194-214.
Elias, L. C. D., Marturano, E. M., Motta, A. M. D., and Giurlani, A. G. (2003). Treating boys with low school achievement and behavior problems: Comparison of two kinds of intervention. Psychological Reports, 92(1), 105-116. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.92.1.105-116
Erdem, C. (2022). A comparative meta-analysis of the effects of problem-based learning model on K-12 students' cognitive outputs. Educational Studies, 50 (6), 1498-1519. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2022.2103650
Ertmer, P., and Simons, K. (2006). Jumping the PBL Implementation Hurdle: Supporting the Efforts of K–12 Teachers. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1005
Fan, L. J., and Sun, L. (2024). Associations between personality, creative thinking and learning, self-efficacy and academic achievement: a cross-sectional survey of coaches in Chinese art schools. Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-04-2024-0904
Gholam, A. P. (2019). Inquiry-based learning: Student teachers’ challenges and perceptions. Journal of Inquiry and Action in Education, 10(2), 6.
Ginsburg-Block, M. D., and Fantuzzo, J. W. (1998). An evaluation of the relative effectiveness of NCTM standards-based interventions for low-achieving urban elementary students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 560-569. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.3.560
Gorbunova, A., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., and Costley, J. (2023). Are Inductive Teaching Methods Compatible with Cognitive Load Theory? Educational Psychology Review, 35(4), Article 111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09828-z
Güllühan, N. U. (2021). Social Problem-Solving Activities in The Life Skills Course: Do Primary School Students Have Difficulty Solving Daily Life Problems? Egitim ve Bilim – Education and Science, 46(207), 63-84. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2021.9396
Guven, B., and Cabakcor, B. O. (2013). Factors influencing mathematical problem-solving achievement of seventh grade Turkish students. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 131-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.003
Hằng, N. V. T. (2025). Educating Vietnamese primary students about creativity competency through teaching theme-based lessons. Pastoral Care in Education, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2025.2470842
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
Hoang, V. V. (2023). Interpreting MoET's 2018 General Education English Curriculum. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 38, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnuf.4866
Jonassen, D. (2010). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203847527
Kalyuga, S. (2007). Expertise Reversal Effect and Its Implications for Learner-Tailored Instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 19(4), 509-539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9054-3
Kanbay, Y., and Okanli, A. (2017). The effect of critical thinking education on nursing students' problem-solving skills. Contemporary Nurse, 53(3), 313-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2017.1339567
Kanfer, R. (1990). Motivation and individual differences in learning: An integration of developmental, differential and cognitive perspectives. Learning and Individual Differences, 2(2), 221-239. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(90)90023-A
Karabay, F. H., and Meşe, C. (2024). The effect of mobile scaffolding on academic achievement and cognitive load of third grade students in mathematical problem solving. Asia Pacific Education Review, 26, 227-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-024-09951-8
Kim, S., Chung, K., and Yu, H. (2013). Enhancing Digital Fluency through a Training Program for Creative Problem Solving Using Computer Programming. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(3), 171-199. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.30
Kim, Y. S., Al Otaiba, S., and Wanzek, J. (2015). Kindergarten predictors of third grade writing. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.11.009
Kirschner, P., Sweller, J., and Clark, R. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
Kopp, B., Hasenbein, M., and Mandl, H. (2014). Case-based learning in virtual groups - collaborative problem solving activities and learning outcomes in a virtual professional training course. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(3), 351-372. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.680964
Letina, A., and Kegel, L. (2024). Learning and Teaching Historical Content in Primary Education. Journal of Elementary Education, 17(3), 259-274.
Lin, C. Y., and Cho, S. (2011). Predicting Creative Problem-Solving in Math From a Dynamic System Model of Creative Problem Solving Ability. Creativity Research Journal, 23(3), 255-261. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2011.595986
Lin, Y. N., Hsia, L. H., and Hwang, G. J. (2025). Developing students' creative problem-solving strategies in the context of blended sports education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(1), 190-207. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13495
Mangtani, A. J. (2024). Pedagogical, andragogical, and heutagogical approaches. In Instructional Design Unleashed: Unlocking Professional Learning Potential with UX, Agile and AI Methods (pp. 155-250). Springer.
MOET. (2018). Chương trình tổng thể Chương trình giáo dục phổ thông 2018 (General Framework of the General Education Curriculum 2018). Retrieved from https://moet.gov.vn/tintuc/Pages/CT-GDPT-Tong-The.aspx?ItemID=8421
Mumford, M. D., Supinski, E. P., Baughman, W. A., Costanza, D. P., and Threlfall, K. V. (1997). Process-based measures of creative problem-solving skills .5. Overall prediction. Creativity Research Journal, 10(1), 73-85. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1001_8
Murawski, L. M. (2014). Critical Thinking in the Classroom…and Beyond. Journal of Learning in Higher Education, 10(1), 25-30.
Nguyen, H.-N., Nguyen, H.-D., and Ta, T.-T. (2024). Enhancing technology competence among primary students through STEAM lessons applying the design thinking process. Journal of Elementary Education, 17(2), 189-207.
Niu, W. H., Cheng, L., Duan, D. A., and Zhang, Q. Y. (2022). Impact of Perceived Supportive Learning Environment on Mathematical Achievement: The Mediating Roles of Autonomous Self-Regulation and Creative Thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 781594. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.781594
Noh, Y. (2017). A study of the effects of library creative zone programs on creative thinking abilities. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 49(4), 380-396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000616650933
Orakci, S. (2023). Structural relationship among academic motivation, academic self-efficacy, problem solving skills, creative thinking skills, and critical thinking skills. Psychology in the Schools, 60(7), 2173-2194. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22851
Ozdem-Yilmaz, Y., and Bilican, K. (2020). Discovery Learning—Jerome Bruner. In B. Akpan and T. J. Kennedy (Eds.), Science Education in Theory and Practice: An Introductory Guide to Learning Theory (pp. 177-190). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_13
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child. Orion.
Ramos Salazar, L., and Hayward, S. (2018). An Examination of College Students' Problem‐Solving Self‐Efficacy, Academic Self‐Efficacy, Motivation, Test Performance, and Expected Grade in Introductory‐Level Economics Courses. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 16. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12161
Redifer, J. L., Bae, C. L., and Zhao, Q. (2021). Self-efficacy and performance feedback: Impacts on cognitive load during creative thinking. Learning and Instruction, 71, Article 101395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101395
Rodríguez-Fornells, A., and Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2000). Impulsive/careless problem solving style as predictor of subsequent academic achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 28(4), 639-645. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00127-0
Roediger, H. L., 3rd, and Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(1), 20-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003
Rosen, Y., Stoeffler, K., and Simmering, V. (2020). Imagine: Design for Creative Thinking, Learning, and Assessment in Schools. Journal of Intelligence, 8(2), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence8020016
Sebastian, J., and Huang, H. (2016). Examining the relationship of a survey based measure of math creativity with math achievement: Cross-national evidence from PISA 2012. International Journal of Educational Research, 80, 74-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.08.010
Segundo-Marcos, R., Carrillo, A. M., Fernández, V. L., and González, M. T. D. (2023). Age-related changes in creative thinking during late childhood: The contribution of cooperative learning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, Article 101331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101331
Song, Y., Lee, Y., and Lee, J. (2022). Mediating effects of self-directed learning on the relationship between critical thinking and problem-solving in student nurses attending online classes: A cross-sectional descriptive study. Nurse Education Today, 109, Article 105227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105227
Stark, R., Gruber, H., Renkl, A., and Mandl, H. (1998). Instructional effects in complex learning: Do objective and subjective learning outcomes converge? Learning and Instruction, 8(2), 117-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(97)00005-4
Stefanou, C., and Parkes, J. (2003). Effects of Classroom Assessment on Student Motivation in Fifth-Grade Science. The Journal of Educational Research, 96(3), 152-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670309598803
Sung, E. (2017). The influence of visualization tendency on problem-solving ability and learning achievement of primary school students in South Korea. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 168-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.007
Thu, H. N. T., Kim, P. D. T., and Le Thi, D. (2024). Using Problem-Based Situations in Teaching for Elementary School Students: A Study on the Vietnamese Curriculum. European Journal of Social Sciences Studies, 9(5).
Tran, T., Nguyen, C., and Nguyen, L. (2022). Educational Innovation in Vietnam: Opportunities and Challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003202424
van Hooijdonk, M., Mainhard, T., Kroesbergen, E. H., and van Tartwijk, J. (2020). Creative problem solving in primary education: Exploring the role of fact finding, problem finding, and solution finding across tasks. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100665
Van Quang, N. (2023). Developing problem-solving and creativity skills in high school students through chemistry teaching in Vietnam: Current status and solution. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 4(6), 321-327.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
Wang, Y.-P. (2021). Effects of Online Problem-Solving Instruction and Identification Attitude Toward Instructional Strategies on Students' Creativity. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 771128. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.771128
Wijekumar, K., Meyer, B. J. F., Lei, P. W., Lin, Y. C., Johnson, L. A., Spielvogel, J. A., and Shurmatz, K. M. (2014). Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial Examining Intelligent Tutoring of Structure Strategy for Fifth-Grade Readers. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7(4), 331-357. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2013.853333
Worwood, M., and Plucker, J. A. (2017). Domain Generality and Specificity in Creative Design Thinking. In F. Darbellay, Z. Moody, & T. Lubart (Eds.), Creativity, Design Thinking and Interdisciplinarity (pp. 83-97). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7524-7_6
Xu, E., Wang, W., and Wang, Q. (2023). The effectiveness of collaborative problem solving in promoting students’ critical thinking: A meta-analysis based on empirical literature. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01508-1
Yang, J., and Zhao, X. H. (2021). The effect of creative thinking on academic performance: Mechanisms, heterogeneity, and implication. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40, Article 100831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100831
Yang, X. T., Zhang, M. M., Zhao, Y. H., Wang, Q., and Hong, J. C. (2022). Relationship between creative thinking and experimental design thinking in science education: Independent or related. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, Article 101183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101183
Yang, Y. T. C. (2015). Virtual CEOs: A blended approach to digital gaming for enhancing higher order thinking and academic achievement among vocational high school students. Computers & Education, 81, 281-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.004
Zhang, D., and Hwang, G. J. (2023). Effects of Interaction between Peer Assessment and Problem-Solving Tendencies on Students' Learning Achievements and Collaboration in Mobile Technology-Supported Project-Based Learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(1), 208-234, Article 07356331221094250. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221094250
Zhang, Y., Paquette, L., Bosch, N., Ocumpaugh, J., Biswas, G., Hutt, S., and Baker, R. S. (2022). The evolution of metacognitive strategy use in an open-ended learning environment: Do prior domain knowledge and motivation play a role? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 69, 102064. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102064
Prenosi
Objavljeno
Številka
Rubrika
Licenca
Avtorske pravice (c) 2025 Pham Ngoc Thien Nguyen, Khanh-Trinh Tran, Giam Buu Le
To delo je licencirano pod Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva 4.0 mednarodno licenco.