MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT MECHANISM OF JUST ENERGY TRANSITION TRAJECTORIES. DO JUST TRANSITION OBSERVATORIES MATTER?just energy transition trajectories. Do Just Transition Observatories matter?
Abstract
The primary aim of the European Green Deal is to move towards climate neutrality in a socially just and inclusive way. To this end, the EU has set up the so-called ‘Just Transition Mechanism’ (JTM), which will provide funding and technical assistance to the regions of the EU most affected by the transition to a green economy. However, in addition to securing sufficient resources and providing technical assistance for their utilisation, a critical factor for the successful outcome of the transition in coal-dependent regions is the establishment of effective monitoring/assessment mechanisms and place-based governance models. This reflects the departure of European politics from horizontal and one-size-fits-all policies. This is done for two reasons: (a) the utilisation of local knowledge and local territorial capital deals better with problems and (b) the transfer of the level of decision-making and implementation of policies as close as possible to the citizens to whom they concern. An effective governance model; however, should be accompanied by an effective mechanism for scientifically monitoring, analysing, evaluating, and formulating substantiated policy proposals. Setting up and operating a Just Transition Observatory could be a valuable support mechanism, provided it has the presumption of multi-level expertise and objectivity, deep knowledge of local specificities and legitimacy to institutionally represent the public interest at the local level. Such an Observatory could function as an independent evaluation body (with periodic reports or focused studies) in the course of the Energy Transition Programmes, identifying potential difficulties, recording impacts, results and outcomes, as well as providing policy recommendations. Given that Just Transition Plans include a number of important transformational policies and transformative plans, the crucial question that arises is whether regional and central policy makers have the tools to evaluate these transformational policies and transformative projects. In this regard, it is necessary to design evaluation models based on predefined indicators and criteria that will be jointly defined in the context of public consultation. This will ensure objectivity on the basis of commonly agreed indicators and objectives, while also guaranteeing the legitimacy and acceptance of both strategic policies and specific investment plans. This paper attempts to examine to what extent there is room for the establishment of ‘Just Transition Observatories’ Platforms along the coal-dependent areas. More specifically, the potential of such mechanism to monitor, analyse and evaluate clean energy transition, and provide robust policy recommendations, will be explored. To this end, Just Transition Observatories will operate as an independent evaluation mechanism producing evidence-based reports and studies on clean energy transition. Thus, the Observatories will be able to deliver periodic reports based on indicators, comparative analysis and policy recommendations. In addition to this, such mechanisms could enhance networking at the EU, national and local level, mobilising scientific dialogue and debate on clean energy transition.
Downloads
References
Betsill, M.M.; Bulkeley, H. (2006), Cities and the Multilevel Governance of Global Climate Change. Glob. Gov. 2006, 12, 141–160.
Börzel, T., & Risse, T, (2010), Governance without a state: Can it work? Regulation & Governance, 4(2), 113-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01076.x
Jordan, A.J.; Huitema, D.; Hildén, M.; Van Asselt, H.; Rayner, T.J.; Schoenefeld, J.J.; Tosun, J.; Förster, J.; Boasson, E.L. (2015), Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2015, 5, 977–982.
Giannakopoulos D., Mavromatidis D. and Topaloglou L. (2022). Just transition and the need for monitoring and assessing mechanisms, EnRe energy & responsibility, International Conference Challenges in Energy, 14 June 2022, Velenje, Slovenia
Geels F.W. (2011), The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, Vol. 1, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 24-40, doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002
Hoppe T. and Miedema M. (2020), A Governance Approach to Regional Energy Transition: Meaning, Conceptualization and Practice, Sustainability,doi: 10.3390/su12030915
Kagimu V. and Ustun, T.S. (2016), "Novel business models and policy directions based on SE4ALL global framework for minigrids," IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Innovative Business Practices for the Transformation of Societies (EmergiTech), pp. 251-256, doi: 10.1109/EmergiTech.2016.7737348
Kemp, R.; Rotmans, J.; Loorbach, D. (2007), Assessing the Dutch Energy Transition Policy: How Does it Deal with Dilemmas of Managing Transitions? J. Environ. Policy Plan. 2007, 9, 315–331.
Loorbach, D.; Van Der Brugge, R.; Taanman, (2008), M. Governance in the energy transition: Practice of transition management in the Netherlands. Int. J. Environ. Technol. Manag. Vol. 9, 294.
Miranda, G. and G. Larcombe (2012), "Enabling Local Green Growth: Addressing Climate Change Effects on Employment and Local Development", OECD Local Economic and Employment Development (LEED) Working Papers, No. 2012/01, OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/5k9h2q92t2r7-en
Ngar-yin Mah D. and Man-ai Cheung D. (2020), Conceptualizing Niche–Regime Dynamics of Energy Transitions from a Political Economic Perspective: Insights from Community-Led Urban Solar in Seoul, Sustainability, Vol. 12, doi:10.3390/su12124818
Petrakos, G., Topaloglou, L., Anagnostou A., & Cupcea V. (2021). Geographies of (in)justice and the (in)effectiveness of place-based policies in Greece. European Planning Studies, 30(5), 899-916. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1928050
Thomson, E. (1916). William Thomson, Lord Kelvin (1824-1907). Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 51(14), 896–899. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20025642
Topaloglou, L. (2020). Spatial (in)justice and place-based strategies in innovation ecosystems: The case of the Alexander Innovation Zone in Thessaloniki. Bulletin of Geography Socio-economic Series, 49(49), 81-92. http://doi.org/10.2478/bog-2020-0025
Topaloglou, L. (2021). Just Transition and Place-Based Policy in Coal-Dependent Areas. Business Management and Strategy, 12(1), 63-77. https://doi.org/10.5296/bms.v12i1.18211
Van Engelenburg, B. ; Maas, N. (2018), Regional Energy Transition (RET): How to improve the connection of praxis and theory? J. Technol. Archit. Environ. Behave. Vol. 1, 62–67