Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Synergies: A Systemic Approach
Ključne besede:
korporativno upravljanje, družbena odgovornost podjetij, sinergije korporativnega upravljanja in družbene odgovornosti podjetij, sistemski pristop, kombinirana uporaba izbranih sistemskih metodologijPovzetek
Upoštevaje pomen korporativnega upravljanja, zlasti različnih mehanizmov le-tega za izboljšanje dejavnosti družbene odgovornosti podjetij, so v članku izpostavljene relevantne sinergije korporativnega upravljanja in družbene odgovornosti podjetij z vidika sistemskega razmišljanja. Namen prispevka je prikazati načine, kako lahko izbrane sistemske metodologije podpirajo te sinergije.
V skladu s tem smo izbrali ustrezne sistemske metodologije, kot so dialektična teorija sistemov, mehkosistemska metodologija in sistemska dinamika. Opredelili smo dialektični sistem, ki ga sestavljajo bistveni mehanizmi korporativnega upravljanja, ki prispevajo k družbeni odgovornosti podjetij; opredelili smo ključne deležnike in njihovo dojemanje odnosov korporativnega upravljanja in družbene odgovornosti podjetij s pomočjo analize CATWOE; tako smo razvili osnovno definicijo in konceptualni model, ki vključuje dejavnosti, relevantne za odnose korporativnega upravljanja in družbene odgovornosti podjetij. Razvit sistemski okvir je zagotovil ustrezno metodološko podporo za poudarjanje različnih vprašanj korporativnega upravljanja, kot so institucionalni okvir, trg za obvladovanje podjetij, lastniška struktura, struktura upravnega odbora in njihov prispevek k družbeni odgovornosti podjetij.
Literatura
Aguilera, R. V., Filatotchev, I., Gospel, H., & Jackson, G. (2008). An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementarities. Organization Science, 19(3), 475–492. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0322
Aguilera, R. V., Williams, C. A., Conley, J. M., & Rupp, D. E. (2006). Corporate governance and social responsibility: A comparative analysis of the UK and the US. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(3), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00495.x
Aguilera, R.V., Desender, K., Bednar, M. K., & Lee, J. H. (2015). Connecting the dots: Bringing external corporate governance into the corporate governance puzzle. The Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 483–573. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2015.1024503
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079
Arora, P., & Dharwadkar, R. (2011). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility (CSR): The moderating roles of attainment discrepancy and organization slack. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(2), 136–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00843.x
Babić, V., & Nikolić, J. (2016). Key factors of corporate governance model development in transition economies. Theme, XL(2), 747-761.
Babić, V. (2010). Corporate governance in transition economies. Theme, 34(2), 555-568.
Babić, V., Nikolić, J., & Erić, J. (2011). Rethinking the performance of board roles: Toward an integrative model. Economic Annals, LVI(190), 140-162. https://doi.org/10.2298/EKA1190140B
Babić, V., Nikolić, J., & Erić, J. (2013). Board Structure and Corporate Performance: Traditional vs. Contemporary Approach. In V. Babić (Ed.), Contemporary Issues in Economics, Business and Management (pp. 49-61). Kragujevac: Ekonomski fakultet Univerziteta u Kragujevcu
Bichta, C. (2016). Corporate social responsibility a role in government policy and regulation? Retrieved from http://www.bath.ac.uk/management/cri/pubpdf/Research_Reports/16_Bichta.pdf
Block, D., & Gerstner, A. M. (2016). One-tier vs. two-tier board structure: A comparison between United States and Germany. Retrieved from http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=fisch_2016
Checkland, P. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Chichester: J. Wiley
Creсpi, R., & Renneboog, L. (2010). (Institutional) shareholder activism new? Evidence from UK shareholder coalitions in the pre-Cadbury era. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(4), 274-295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00795.x
Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella, A. A. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196703
Dam, L., & Scholtens, B. (2012). Does ownership type matter for corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(3), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00907.x
Dam, L., & Scholtens, B. (2013). Ownership concentration and CSR policy of European multinational enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1574-1
Denis, D., & McConnell, J. (2003). International corporate governance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/4126762
Devinney, T. M. (2009). Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23, 44–56. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2009.39985540
Devinney, T., Schwalbach, J., & Williams, C. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance: Comparative perspectives. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(5), 413–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12041
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-326. https://doi.org/10.1086/467037
Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz-Blanco, S. (2014). Women on boards: Do they affect sustainability reporting? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(6), 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1329
Freeman, R. E. (1999). Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 233-236. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1893932
Harjoto, M. A., & Jo, H. (2011). Corporate governance and CSR nexus. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0772-6
Huang, C. J. (2010). Corporate governance, corporate social responsibility and corporate performance. Journal of Management & Organization, 16(5), 641–655. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1833367200001784
Huse, M. (2007). Boards, Governance and Value Creation: The Human side of corporate governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611070
Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2012). What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(9), 834-864. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2012.26
ISO (2010). ISO 26000:2010 ISO. International Organization for Standardization, Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/iso/social_responsibility
Jain, T., & Jamali, D. (2016). Looking inside the black box: The effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12154
Jamali, D., Hallal, M., & Abdallah, H. (2010). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: evidence from the healthcare sector. Corporate Governance, 10(5), 590-602. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701011085562
Jamali, D., Safieddine, A., & Rabbath, M. (2008). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: Synergies and interrelation- ships. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(5), 443–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00702.x
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economic, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
La Porta, R., López de Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00115
Lane, D. (2008). The emergence and use of diagramming in system dynamics: A critical account. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 25(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.826
Larcker, D., & Tayan, B. (2011). Corporate governance matters: A closer look at organizational choices and their consequences. New Yersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Lebe, S. S., & Mulej, M., guest-editors and authors, with coauthors (2014). Social responsibility and holism in tourism. Kybernetes, 43(3-4), 346-666.
Mallin, C. A., Michelon, G., & Raggi, D. (2013). Monitoring intensity and stakeholders’ orientation: How does governance affect social and environmental disclosure? Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1324-4
Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2008). Thinking of the organization as a system: The role of managerial perceptions in developing a corporate social responsibility strategic agenda. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 25, 413-426. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.900
Monks, R., & Minow, N. (2002). Corporate Governance. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing
Morgan, S. (2009). The impact of corporate social responsibility on mergers and acquisition. Oregon: Oregon State University - University Honors College, Corvallis
Mulej, M. (1974). Dialektična teorija sistemov in ljudski reki (in Slovene: The Dialectical Systems Theory and Proverbs). Naše gospodarstvo, 21(3-4), 207-212.
Mulej, M. (2000). Dialektična in druge mehkosistemske teorije (In Slovene: The Dialectical and Other Soft-Systems Theories). Maribor: University of Maribor, Faculty of Economics and Business
Mulej, M. & (by ABC order): S. Božičnik, V. Čančer, A. Hrast, T. Jere Lazanski, K. Jurše, Š. Kajzer, J. Knez-Riedl, T. Mlakar, N. Mulej, V. Potočan,
F. Risopoulos, B. Rosi, G. Steiner, T. Štrukelj, D. Uršič, Z. Ženko (2013a). Dialectical Systems Thinking and the Law of Requisite Holism Concerning Innovation. Litchfield Park, AZ: Emergent Publication
Mulej, M., Hrast, A., & Ženko, Z. guest-editors and authors, with coauthors (2013b). Social responsibility – measures and measurement. Systems Practice and Action Research, 26(6), 471-588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-013-9297-5
Mulej, M., Hrast, A., & Dyck, R., guest-editors and authors, with coauthors (2015). Social responsibility – a new socio-economic order. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 32(2),147-264 https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2253
Neubaum, D. O., & Zahra, S. A. (2006). Institutional ownership and corporate social performance: The moderating effects of investment horizon, activism, and coordination. Journal of Management, 32(1), 108–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305277797
Nikolić, J., & Babić, V. (2016). The implications of ownership concentration for shareholder protection and strategic decision-making. Economic Annals, LXI(211), 47-76. https://doi.org/10.2298/EKA1611069N
Rees, W., & Rodionova, T. (2015). The influence of family ownership on corporate social responsibility: An international analysis of publicly listed companies. Corporate Governance: an International Review, 23(3), 184-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12086
Sánchez, J. L. F., Sotorrío, L. L., & Díez, E. B. (2011). The relationship between corporate governance and corporate social behavior: a structural equation model analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(2), 91-101. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.244
Savović, S. (2012). The importance of post-acquisition integration for value creation and success of mergers and acquisitions. Economic Horizons, 14(3), 193-205. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekonhor1203193S
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x
Sjöström, E. (2008). Shareholder activism for corporate social responsibility: What do we know? Sustainable Development, 16(3), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.361
Stojanović-Aleksić, V., Erić-Nilesen, J., & Bošković, A. (2016). Social responsibility in the banking sector: Experience from Serbia. Bankarstvo, 45(2), 35-55. https://doi.org/10.5937/bankarstvo1602034S
Tricker, B. (2009). Corporate Governance: Principles, Policies and Practices. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.
Windsor, D. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Three key approaches. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00584.x
Yoshikawa, T., & Rasheed, A. (2009). Convergence of corporate governance: Critical review and future directions. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 388–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00745.x
Ženko, Z., & Mulej, M. (2011). Diffusion of innovative behaviour with social responsibility. Kybernetes, 40(9/10), 1258-1272. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684921111169378
Ženko, Z., Hrast, A., & Mulej, M. (2013). Social responsibility: Measures and measurement as a basis for organizational systemic action. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 26, 475-484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-013-9306-8
Zhang, J. Q., Zhu, H., & Ding, H. (2013). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: An empirical investigation in the post Sarbanes-Oxley era. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(3), 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1352-0
Zhang, R., Rezaee, Z., & Zhu, J. (2010). Corporate philanthropic disaster response and ownership type: Evidence from Chinese firms’ response to the Sichuan earthquake. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0067-3
Zlatanović, D. (2012). System dynamics models in management problems solving. Economic Horizons, 14(1), 25-38.
Zlatanović, D. (2015). A holistic approach to corporate social responsibility as a prerequisite for sustainable development: empirical evidence. Economic Annals, LX(207), 69-94. https://doi.org/10.2298/EKA1507069Z
Zlatanović, D., & Mulej, M. (2015). Soft-systems approaches to knowledge-cum-values management as innovation drivers. Baltic Journal of Management, 10(4), 497-518. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-01-2015-0015