COMPARISON OF CAVITATION MODELS FOR THE PREDICTION OF CAVITATION AROUND A HYDROFOIL

  • Marko Pezdevšek University of Maribor, Faculty of Energy Technology
  • Ignacijo Biluš University of Maribor, Faculty of Energy Technology
  • Gorazd Hren University of Maribor, Faculty of Energy Technology
Keywords: Hydrofoil, cavitation, nsys CFX

Abstract

In this paper, four different cavitation models were compared for predicting cavitation around a hy-drofoil. A blocked structured mesh was created in ICEM CFD. Steady-state 2D simulations were per-formed in Ansys CFX. For all cases, the SST turbulence model with Reboud’s correction was used. For Zwart and Schnerr cavitation models, the recommended values were used for the empirical co-efficients. For the full cavitation model and Kunz cavitation model, values for the empirical coeffici-ents were determined as the recommended values did not provide satisfactory results. For the full cavitation model, the effect of non-condensable gases was neglected. For all the above-mentioned cavitation models, the pressure coefficient distribution was compared to experimental results from the literature.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

D. Ziru LI: Assessment of Cavitation Erosion with a Multiphase Reynolds‐Averaged Navier‐Stokes Method, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, P.R. China, 2012.

ANSYS, Inc.: ANSYS CFX tutorials, 2016

F. R. Menter: Two‐Equation Eddy‐Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications, AIAA Journal, Volume 32, No. 8, August 1994.

J. L. Reboud, B. Stutz, O. Coutier‐Delgosha: Two phase flow structure of cavitation experiment and modeling of unsteady effects, Proceedings of the 3 rd International Symposium on Cavitation, Grenoble, France, 1998.

P. J. Zwart, A. G. Gerber, T. Belamri: A Two‐Phase Flow Model for Predicting Cavitation Dynamics, ICMF 2004 International Conference on Multiphase Flow, Yokohama, Japan, 2004

G. H. Schnerr: Physical and Numerical Modeling of Unsteady Cavitation Dynamics, ICMF‐2001, 4th International Conference on Multiphase Flow, New Orleans, USA, 2001

A. K. Singhal, H. Li, Y. Jiang: Mathematical Basis and Validation of the Full Cavitation Model, Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2002

A. K. Singhal, N. Vaidya, A. D. Leonard: Multi‐Dimensional Simulation of Cavitating Flows Using a PDF Model for Phase Change, ASME FED Meeting, Vancouver, Canada, 1997.

C. L. Merkle, J. Feng, P. Buelow: Computational modelling of the dynamics of sheet cavitation, Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Cavitation, Grenoble, France,1998.

R. F. Kunz, D. A. Boger, D. R. Stinebring, T. S. Chyczewski, J. W. Lindau, H. J. Gibeling, S. Venkateswaran, T. R. Govindan: Preconditioned Navier‐Stokes Method for Two‐Phase Flows with Application to Cavitation Prediction, Computers & Fluids 29, 2000.

Published
2023-12-22
How to Cite
Pezdevšek M., Biluš I., & Hren G. (2023). COMPARISON OF CAVITATION MODELS FOR THE PREDICTION OF CAVITATION AROUND A HYDROFOIL. Journal of Energy Technology, 14(1), 41-55. https://doi.org/10.18690/jet.14.1.41-55.2021
Section
Articles